Seven phenolic compounds including (±)-erythro-1-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)propane-1,2-diol (1), (±)-threo-1-
(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)propane-1,2-diol (2), (R)-3-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)propane-1,2-diol (3), (±)-3-(3,4,5-
trimethoxyphenyl)propane-1,2-diol (4), (+)-syringaresinol (5), (7S,8R,8′R)-5,5′-dimethoxylariciresinol (6), juniperoside
(7) were isolated from the leaves of Trigonostemon honbaensis. Their chemical structures were determined using ESIMS, 1D NMR, and 2D NMR spectra and in comparison with the reported literature. Compounds1- 7 were reported from
Trigonostemongenus for the first time. At concentration of 30 µM, compounds 1-7 exhibited weak cytotoxic activity
with cell viability percentages as low as 73.3±0.87 % and 79.5±0.23 % on CAL-27 and MDA-MB231 cell lines,
respectively.
6 trang |
Chia sẻ: thuyduongbt11 | Ngày: 17/06/2022 | Lượt xem: 200 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Phenolic compounds from Trigonostemon honbaensis and their cytotoxic activity, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Cite this paper: Vietnam J. Chem., 2020, 58(6), 759-764 Article
DOI: 10.1002/vjch.202000068
759 Wiley Online Library © 2020 Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi & Wiley-VCH GmbH
Phenolic compounds from Trigonostemon honbaensis
and their cytotoxic activity
Ninh Khac Ban
1,2
, Luu Hong Truong
3
, Tran My Linh
1
, Nguyen Chi Mai
1
, Duong Thi Hai Yen
1
,
Vu Van Doan
1
, Nguyen Xuan Nhiem
1,2
, Bui Huu Tai
1,2*
and Phan Van Kiem
1,2*
1
Institute of Marine Biochemistry, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST), 18 Hoang Quoc
Viet, Cau Giay, Hanoi 10000, Viet Nam
2
Graduate University of Science and Technology, VAST, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay, Hanoi 10000,
Viet Nam
3
Southern Institute of Ecology, VAST, 01 Mac Dinh Chi Street, Ho Chi Minh City, 70000, Viet Nam
Received April 30, 2020; Accepted July 15, 2020
Abstract
Seven phenolic compounds including (±)-erythro-1-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)propane-1,2-diol (1), (±)-threo-1-
(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)propane-1,2-diol (2), (R)-3-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)propane-1,2-diol (3), (±)-3-(3,4,5-
trimethoxyphenyl)propane-1,2-diol (4), (+)-syringaresinol (5), (7S,8R,8′R)-5,5′-dimethoxylariciresinol (6), juniperoside
(7) were isolated from the leaves of Trigonostemon honbaensis. Their chemical structures were determined using ESI-
MS, 1D NMR, and 2D NMR spectra and in comparison with the reported literature. Compounds1- 7 were reported from
Trigonostemongenus for the first time. At concentration of 30 µM, compounds 1-7 exhibited weak cytotoxic activity
with cell viability percentages as low as 73.3±0.87 % and 79.5±0.23 % on CAL-27 and MDA-MB231 cell lines,
respectively.
Keywords. Trigonostemon honbaensis, phenolic, cytotoxic activity.
1. INTRODUCTION
The plants of the Trigonostemon genus
(Euphorbiaceae family) comprising about 85 species
which are mainly distributed in tropical and
subtropical regions of the Asia. Chemical studies on
this plant genus have led to the discovery of about
200 structurally diverse compounds in the last two
decades, some of which have shown promising
biological activities. Of these, Vietnam is considered
to be the center of diversity for this genus with 22
species. Recently, the T. honbaensis
Tagane&Yahara is recorded as a new and endemic
Trigonostemon species, growing at Hon Ba nature
reserve of Vietnam.
[1]
Several parts of the plants
from Trigonostemon genus have been traditionally
used as folk medicines for treatment of diarrhea,
asthma, and skin diseases. Since array of interesting
diterpenoids, phenolics, steroids, indole and β-
carboline alkaloids reviewed from Trigonostemon
genus, the chemical constituent of this plant species
rapidly attempted to investigate during the last
decade.
[2,3]
Over 10 plants in this genus have been
phytochemically investigated which resulted in
isolation and chemical structural elucidation of over
200 compounds.
[3-7]
Isolated diterpenes (daphnane
diterpenoid orthoesters), indole alkaloids
(trigonoliimines) and β-carboline alkaloids
(trigonoines and trigonostemines) were performed
total synthesis because of their interesting chemical
structure framework and/or valuable biological
activities.
[8-10]
This paper reports the isolation,
structural identification of seven phenolic
compounds (1-7) from the leaves of T. honbaensis
and their cytotoxic activity on CAL-27 and MDA-
MB231 cell lines.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Plant materials
The leaves of Trigonostemon honbaensis Tagane &
Yahara were collected at Nui Chua national park,
Ninh Thuan province, Vietnam in December 2018
and identified by one of the authors, Dr. Luu Hong
Truong. A voucher specimen (No. NCCT-P79) was
Vietnam Journal of Chemistry Phan Van Kiem et al.
© 2020 Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi & Wiley-VCH GmbH www.vjc.wiley-vch.de 760
kept at the Institute of Marine Biochemistry,
Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology.
2.2. General experimental procedures
The used characterization equipment’s are the same
as described in our previous work.
[10]
2.3. Extraction and isolation
The dried powdered leaves of Trigonostemon
honbaensis (4 kg) was extracted with methanol for
three times (each 10L) under sonication (each 60
min) at room temperature. After filtration, filtrated
methanol was evaporated under reduced pressure to
yield 450 g dark residue. This methanol residue was
then suspended with distilled water (3.0 L) and
partitioned in turn with dichloromethane and ethyl
acetate to give dichloromethane (80.0 g), ethyl
acetate (5.0 g), and water-soluble portions.
The dichloromethane extract (80.0 g) was
chromatographed on a silica gel column eluting with
hexane/acetone (gradient from 40/1 to 0/1, v/v) to
give 8 fractions as TB1A (10.0 g), TB1B (5.0 g),
TB1C (3.0 g), TB1D (3.0 g), TB1E (4.0 g), TB1F
(10.0 g), TB1G (0.5 g), and TB1H (2.3 g). The
fraction TB1F (10.0 g) was further chromatographed
on a YMC column eluting with acetone/water (1/2,
v/v) to give five subfractions as TB7A (1.0 g), TB7B
(1.0 g), TB7C (3.0 g), TB7D (0.5 g), TB7E (230
mg). TB7B (1.0 g) was further re-chromatographed
on a silica gel column eluting with n-hexane/acetone
(2/1, v/v) to give TB8A (500 mg), TB8B (200 mg),
TB8C (200 mg). The TB8B was purified on HPLC
column (J’sphere ODS H-80, 250mm×20mm
column) eluting with 20 % acetonitrile (20 %ACN)
to yield 1 (5.0 mg) and 2 (6 mg). The TB8C was
purified on HPLC column (J’sphere ODS H-80,
250mm×20mm column) eluting with 18 %
acetonitrile (18 % ACN) to yield 3 (8.0 mg) and 4 (8
mg). The TB7D (500 mg) was chromatographed on
a silica gel column eluting with hexane/acetone
(1.5/1, v/v) to give TB13A (100 mg), TB13B (100
mg), TB13C (102 mg). Compound 6 was obtained
from TB13C by purifying on HPLC column
(J’sphere ODS H-80, 250mm×20mm column)
eluting with 30 % acetonitrile. Fraction TB7E (230
mg) was chromatographed on a silica gel column
eluting with n-hexane/acetone (1/1, v/v) to give
compounds 5 (28.6 mg) and 7 (15 mg).
Figure 1: Chemical structures of compounds 1-7
(±)-Erythro-1-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)propane-
1,2-diol (1): Colorless powder; mp 105-106
o
C, c
25D : 0.0° (c 0.1, MeOH), UV (λmax): 212, 263 nm,
IR (KBr) ν (cm-1): 3250-3300, 1600, 1404, 1054;
ESI-MS m/z241 [M-H]
-
; C12H18O5;
1
H-NMR
(CD3OD, 500 MHz) and
13
C-NMR (CD3OD, 125
MHz) data, see table 1.
(±)-Threo-1-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)propane-
1,2-diol (2): Colorless powder; mp. 109-110
o
C,
Vietnam Journal of Chemistry Phenolic compounds from T. honbaensis
© 2020 Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi & Wiley-VCH GmbH www.vjc.wiley-vch.de 761
25D : 0.0°(c 0.1, MeOH), UV (λmax): 211, 262 nm,
IR (KBr) ν (cm-1): 3240-3300, 1595, 1400, 1035;
ESI-MS m/z 241 [M-H]
-
; C12H18O5;
1
H-NMR
(CD3OD, 500 MHz) and
13
C-NMR (CD3OD, 125
MHz) data, see table 1.
(R)-3-3-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)propane-1,2-diol
(3): Colorless amorphous; mp 86-87
o
C, 25D : +35°
(c 0.1, MeOH), UV (λmax): 210, 265 nm, IR (KBr) ν
(cm
-1
): 3200-3300, 1610, 14013, 1050; ESI-MS m/z
211 [M-H]
-
; C11H16O4;
1
H-NMR (CD3OD, 500
MHz) and
13
C-NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz) data, see
table 2.
Kmeriolor (±)-3-(3,4,5-
trimethoxyphenyl)propane-1,2-diol (4):
Colorlesspowder; mp 96-97
o
C, 25D : 0.0° (c 0.1,
MeOH), UV (λmax): 213, 258 nm, IR (KBr) ν (cm
-1
):
3220-3310, 1612, 1400, 1054; ESI-MS m/z 241[M-
H]
-
; C12H8O5.
1
H-NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz) and
13
C-NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz) data, see table 2.
(+)-Syringaresinol (5): Colorless amorphous; mp
175-176
o
C, 25D : +45° (c 0.1, MeOH), UV (λmax):
215, 260 nm, IR (KBr) ν (cm-1): 3240-3300, 1604,
1403, 1036; ESI-MS m/z 417 [M-H]
-
; C22H26O10.
1
H-
NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz) and
13
C-NMR (CDCl3,
CD3OD, 125 MHz) data, see table 3.
(7S,8R,8′R)-5,5′-dimethoxylariciresinol (6):
Colorless amorphous; mp 125-126
o
C, 25D : +11° (c
0.1, MeOH),UV (λmax): 214, 265 nm, IR (KBr) ν
(cm
-1
): 3240-3300, 1595, 1401, 1034; ESI-MS m/z
419 [M-H]
-
; C22H28O8.
1
H-NMR (CD3OD, 500
MHz) and
13
C-NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz) data, see
table 3.
Juniperoside (7)
[9]
Light yellow powder; mp 112-116
o
C. 25D : -47° (c
0.1, MeOH), ESI-MS m/z 387 [M+H]
+
.
1
H-NMR
(500 MHz, CD3OD) δ (ppm): 6.75 (2H, s, H-2, H-6),
6.65 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, H-7), 6.33 (1H, ddd, J =
16.0, 7.0, 5.5 Hz, H-8), 4.34 (1H, ddd, J = 12.5, 5.5,
1.0 Hz, Ha-9), 4.53 (1H, ddd, J = 12.5, 7.0, 1.0 Hz,
Hb-9), 3.87 (6H, s, 2xOCH3, H-10, H-12), 3.87 (3H,
s, 11-OCH3), Glc: 4.89 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1′),
3.25 (1H, dd, J = 9.0, 7.5 Hz, H-2′), 3.38 (1H, dd, J
= 9.0, 9.0 Hz, H-3′), 3.30 (1H, dd, J = 9.0, 9.0 Hz,
H-4′), 3.28 (1H, m, H-5′), 3.70 (1H, dd, J = 11.5, 5.5
Hz, Ha-6′), 3.91 (1H, dd, J = 11.5, 2.0 Hz, Hb-6′).
13
C-NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD) δ (ppm): 133.7 (C-1),
105.0 (C-2, C-6), 154.6 (C-3, C-5), 139.0 (C-4),
133.7 (C-7), 126.4 (C-8), 70.7 (C-9), 56.6 (C-10, C-
12), 61.2 (C-11), Glc: 103.4 (C-1′), 75.2 (C-2′), 78.0
(C-3′), 71.7 (C-4′), 78.1 (C-5′), 62.8 (C-6′).
Table 1:
1
H- and
13
C-NMR data for compounds 1 and 2 and reference compounds
C
1 2
#δC
a,bδC
a,cδH (mult., J in Hz)
@δC
a,bδC
a,cδH (mult., J in Hz)
1 77.3 79.1 4.45 (d, 5.0) 79.4 80.1 4.45 (d, 5.0)
2 71.3 72.4 3.86* 72.0 72.8 3.86*
3 16.9 18.4 1.15 (d, 6.5) 18.7 19.3 1.02 (d, 6.5)
1 137.0 138.2 - 137.0 138.5 -
2 104.0 105.4 6.72 (s) 104.0 105.5 6.70 (s)
3 153.0 154.2 153.0 154.3
4 137.0 139.6 137.0 139.5
5 153.0 154.2 - 153.0 154.3 -
6 104.0 105.4 6.72 (s) 104.0 105.5 6.70 (s)
3,5-OCH3 56.0 56.6 3.86 (s) 56.0 56.6 3.86 (s)
4-OCH3 60.7 61.1 3.77 (s) 60.7 61.1 3.77 (s)
Measured in a)CD3OD,
b)125 MHz, c)500 MHz. #δC of (±)-erythro-1-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)propane-1,2-diol in CDCl3,
[4] δC of
(±)-threo-1-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)propane-1,2-diol in CDCl3,
[4] *Overlapped signals.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Compound 1 was obtained as a colorless amorphous
powder. The
1
H NMR spectrum of 1 showed signals
of two aromatic protons at δH 6.72 (2H, s), three
methoxy groups at δH 3.86 (6H, s) and 3.76 (3H, s),
two methine carbinol protons at δH 4.45 (d, J = 5.0
Hz) and 3.86 (m), and a doublet methyl signal at δH
1.15 (J = 6.5 Hz). These data suggested that
compound 1 was a phenyl propane compounds
having three methoxy groups. The
13
C NMR
spectrum of 1 exhibited four signals of the 3,4,5-
trimethoxyphenyl group at δC 154.2, 139.6, 138.2,
105.4, two methine carbinol carbons at δC 79.1 and
Vietnam Journal of Chemistry Phan Van Kiem et al.
© 2020 Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi & Wiley-VCH GmbH www.vjc.wiley-vch.de 762
72.4, one methyl group at δC 18.4, and three
methoxy groups at δC 56.6 (x 2) and 61.1. The above
evidence suggested that compound 1 was 1-(3,4,5-
trimethoxyphenyl)propane-1,2-diol, which were
further confirmed by comparing NMR data of 1 with
those of (±)-erythro-1-(3,4,5-
trimethoxyphenyl)propane-1,2-diol
[4]
and found to
match (table 1). In addition, the JH-7/H-8 coupling
constant was 5.0 Hz confirming that compound 1
was erythro stereoisomer at C-1 and C-2.
[4]
From the
above evidence and ESI-MS results, compound 1
was identified as (±)-erythro-1-(3,4,5-
trimethoxyphenyl)propane-1,2-diol.
The NMR spectra of 2 were very similar to those of
1 suggesting that compounds 2 and 1 have the same
planar structure (table 1). The ESI-MS of 2 exhibited
an ion peak at m/z 242 [M-H]
-
corresponding to the
molecular formula of C12H18O5 as 1. However,
comparing the JH-7/H-8 coupling constant between
these compounds found that JH-7/H-8 coupling
constant of compound 2 was 7.0 Hz, much larger
than that of compound 1. This evidence confirmed
compound 2 was threo stereoisomer at C-1 and C-
2.
[4]
Consequently, compound 2 was identified as
(±)-threo-1-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)propane-1,2-
diol.
Table 2:
1
H- and
13
C-NMR data for compounds 3 and 4 and reference compounds
C
3 4
@δC
a,bδC
a,cδH (mult., J in Hz)
#δC
a,bδC
a,cδH (mult., J in Hz)
1
65.7 66.6
3.47 (dd, 6.0, 11.5)
3.52 (dd, 4.5, 11.5)
66.6 66.6
3.47 (dd, 6.0, 11.5)
3.52 (dd, 4.5, 11.5)
2 72.9 74.5 3.82 (m) 73.0 74.4 3.54 (m)
3
39.2 40.5
2.64 (dd, 7.5, 13.5)
2.79 (dd, 5.5, 13.5)
40.1 41.2
2.63 (dd, 7.5, 13.5)
2.80 (dd, 5.5, 13.5)
1 130.1 133.1 - 136.4 136.4 -
2 111.1 113.2 6.89 (d, 2.0) 106.1 107.8 6.58 (s)
3 147.4 149.0 - 153.1 154.3 -
4 148.7 150.3 - 133.7 137.5 -
5 112.3 114.6 6.87 (d, 8.5) 153.1 154.3 -
6 121.0 122.8 6.80 (dd, 2.0, 8.5) 106.1 107.8 6.58 (s)
3,5-
OCH3
55.8 56.6 3.84 (s) 56.0 56.6 3.84 (s)
4-OCH3 55.8 56.4 3.84 (s) 60.8 61.1 3.75 (s)
Measured in a)CD3OD,
b)125 MHz, c)500 MHz.@δC of (R)-3-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)propane-1,2-diolin CDCl3
[5], #δC of kmeriol in
CDCl3.
[6]
The
1
H NMR spectrum of 3 showed three
aromatic protons with ABX coupling system at δH
6.89 (d, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.80 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.0 Hz), and
6.87 (d, J = 8.5 Hz) suggesting for a 1,3,4-
trisubstituted aromatic ring, two methoxy groups at
δH 3.84 (3H, s) and 3.75 (3H, s), one methine
carbinol proton at δH 3.84 (m), two oxygenated
methylene groups at δH 3.47 (1H, dd, J = 11.5, 6.0
Hz) and 3.52 (1H, dd, J = 11.5, 4.5 Hz), and two
other protons corresponding to CH2-Ph group at 2.64
(dd, J = 13.5, 7.5 Hz) and 2.79 (dd, J =13.5, 5.5
Hz). The
13
C NMR spectrum of 3 showed six
aromatic carbons at δC 150.3, 149.0, 133.1, 122.8,
114.6, 113.2; two methoxy groups at δC56.6 and
56.4, and other signals at δC 74.5 (CH), 66.6 (CH2)
and 40.5 (CH2). These carbon data together above
proton data were found to match well with the
corresponding data of 3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-
propane-1,2-diol
[5]
(table 2), which were further
confirmed by HMBC spectra. The optical rotation of
3 was +35
o
(measured in CDCl3, c 1.0) suggesting
for R configuration of C-2.
[5]
The NMR data of 4 were very similar to those of
3 suggesting that they are the same phenyl propane
compounds as 3. However, compound 4 had one
more methoxy group attaching to the aromatic ring
[δH3.84 (6H, s)/δc 56.6 (2 x OCH3), δH3.75 (3H, s)/δc
61.1 (OCH3)]. Only four carbon aromatic signals
observed at δC154.3 (C), 137.5 (C), 136.4 (C), 107.8
(CH) confirmed that three methoxy groups were at
C-3, C-4, C-5 of the aromatic ring. The ESI-MS of
4 exhibited an ion peak at m/z 241 [M-H]
-
corresponding to the molecular formula of C12H8O5.
Finally, the NMR data of 4 were compared to those
of kmeriol or (±)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-1,2-
propanedioland found to match well.
[5]
The optical
rotation of 4 was almost zero suggesting that 4 was a
racemic at C-2 center.
Vietnam Journal of Chemistry Phenolic compounds from T. honbaensis
© 2020 Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi & Wiley-VCH GmbH www.vjc.wiley-vch.de 763
The
13
C NMR spectra of 5 (in CD3OD) showed
ten signals including four aromatic carbon signals at
δC 149.4, 136.3, 133.2, 104.6, one methoxy signal at
δC 56.8, one oxygenated methine carbon at δC 87.6,
one oxygenated methylene carbon at δC 72.8, and
one methine carbon at δC 55.5.The
1
H NMR spectra
of 5 (in CD3OD) showed one singlet aromatic signal
at δH 6.67 and a methoxy singlet signal at δH 3.85
(6H) suggesting that the aromatic ring have two
methoxy groups at C-3, C-5ʹ and one hydroxy
group at C-4. The ESI-MS of 5 exhibited an ion
peak at m/z 417 [M-H]
-
corresponding to the
molecular formula of C22H26O10. The above evidence
suggested that compound 5 has a quadratic
symmetry structure as (+)-syringaresinol.
[7]
The
NMR data of 5 (in CD3OD and also in CDCl3 as
solvent measured for referenced compound) were
compared to those of syringaresinol (in CDCl3) as
shown in table 3 and found to match well.
The NMR spectra of 6 showed two aromatic ring
identified by one singlet at δH 6.65 (2H, s) and one
other singlet at δH 6.53 (2H, s). Two oxygenated
methylene carbons were at δC 73.6 and 60.5, one
oxygenated methine was at δC 84.2, one methine and
one methylene were at δC 43.8 and 34.2,
respectively. The above data suggested that
compound 6 was a lignan phenolic compound as
(7S,8R,8′R)-5,5′-dimethoxylariciresinol.[8] The NMR
data of 6 matched with those of (7S,8R,8′R)-5,5′-
dimethoxylariciresinol as shown in Table 3.
Furthermore, the ESI-MS spectrum of 6 exhibited an
ion peak at m/z 419 [M-H]
-
corresponding to the
molecular formula of C22H28O8.
The NMR spectra of 7 confirmed the presence of
one aromatic ring having a quadratic symmetry
structure [δC154.6, 139.0, 133.7, 105.0/δH 6.75 (2H,
s)] one trans double bond [δC133.7/δH 6.65, 126.4/δH
6.33, JH-7/H-8 = 16.0 Hz], one oxygenated methylene
group [δC70.7/δH 4.34 and 4.53], and one
glucopyranosyl unit identified by a typical set of
carbons from C-1ʹ to C-6ʹ as δC 103.4, 75.2, 78.2,
71.8, 78.2, 62.9. The anomeric proton was at δH 4.39
with lager coupling constant of H-1ʹ/H-2ʹ (J = 7.5
Hz) confirmed the β-form of sugar linkage. Finally,
all the spectroscopic data of 7 were found to match
with the corresponding data of juniperoside.
[9]
Table 3:
1
H- and
13
C-NMR data for compounds 5 and 6 and reference compounds
C
5 6
#δC
d,bδC
a,bδC
a,cδH (mult., J, Hz)
@δC
a,bδC
a,cδH (mult., J, Hz)
1 132.14 132.5 133.2 - 132.9 132.8 -
2 102.77 103.2 104.6 6.73 s 104.6 104.4 6.65 (s)
3 147.18 147.2 149.4 - 149.4 149.3 -
4 134.37 134.8 136.3 - 135.2 135.1 -
5 147.18 147.2 149.4 - 149.4 149.3 -
6 102.77 103.2 104.6 6.73 s 104.6 104.4 6.65 (s)
7 86.07 86.1 87.6 4.77 d (4.5) 84.3 84.2 4.78 (d, 6.5)
8 54.38 54.8 55.5 3.14 m 54.1 54.1 2.41 (m)
9 71.81 72.8 72.7
4.30 d (9.0)
3.93 dd (3.0, 9.0)
60.6 60.5 3.68 (dd, 6.5, 11.0)
3.85*
1′ 132.14 132.5 133.2 - 132.9 132.8 -
2′ 102.77 103.2 104.6 6.73 s 107.3 107.1 6.53 (s)
3′ 147.18 147.2 149.4 - 149.4 149.3 -
4′ 134.37 134.8 136.3 - 135.2 136.0 -
5′ 147.1 147.2 149.4 - 149.4 149.3 -
6′ 102.77 103.2 104.6 6.73 s 107.3 107.1 6.53 (s)
7′
86.07
86.1 87.6 4.77 d (4.5)
73.6 73.6 3.76 (dd, 2.6, 6.0)
4.03 (dd, 6.0, 8.5)
8′ 54.38 54.8 55.5 3.14 m 43.8 43.8 2.76 (m)
9′ 71.81 72.8 72.7
4.30 d (9.0)
3.93 dd (3.0, 9.0)
34.0 34.2 2.52 (dd, 11.5, 13.0)
2.96 (dd, 5.0, 13.0)
4xOCH3 56.40 53.7 56.8 3.89 (s) 56.9 56.8 3.85 (s)
Measured in a)CD3OD,
b)125 MHz, c)500 MHz, d)CDCl3,
#δC of syringaresinol measured in CDCl3
[7]
,
@δC of (7S,8R,8R)-5,5-dimethoxylariciresinol in CD3OD.
[8]
Vietnam Journal of Chemistry Phan Van Kiem et al.
© 2020 Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi & Wiley-VCH GmbH www.vjc.wiley-vch.de 764
Table 4: Effect of compounds 1-7 (30 µM) on cell viability of CAL-27 and MDA-MB 231 cancer cell lines
Compounds
Cell viability (%)
CAL-27
(Tongue cancer cells)
MDA-MB 231
(Breast cancer cells)
1 89.3±0.98 101.3±0.26
2 102.5±0.92 83.9±0.10
3 84.2±1.10 79.5±0.23
4 81.7±0.87 81.8±0.02
5 73.3±0.87 94.6±0.01
6 85.2±1.00 93.4±0.69
7 95.3±0.88 91.2±0.64
Blank 100.0±0.67 100.0±0.90
MX 12.0±0.12 15.0±0.24
a
Mitoxantrone (MX), an anticancer agent, was used as reference compound.
Compounds 1-7 were reported from Trigonostemon
genus for the first time.
Compounds 1-7 were screened their cytotoxicity
on CAL-27 and MDA-MB 231 human cancer cell
lines using MTT assay. As the results, compounds 1-
7 exhibited weak cytotoxic activity on both CAL-27
and MDA-MB 231 cell lines. In the presence of
compounds 1-7 (30 µM), cell viability percentages
were obse